Thoughts

 When thoughts are all scrambled up in the mind and the consciousness can't figure out as what to write...The moto is - Just keep thinking, just keep writing !

No sequences, no consequences. An unplanned dump of words, with unevenly distributed emotions and distorted thoughts. The heart asks to keep typing and the mind thus follows. The formal definition says that a group of words making some sense is a 'sentence'. But what if they don't? 

Not everything has to have a meaning in it. Not all events have to fall in an equation. The LHS, can also be independent of RHS. Buy how come?..say, sin ( z ) = 2. Well for the sake of the 'Laws of Nature' you have to put the '=' sign but it doesn't need to be literally equal you know. The maximum value of a sinusoidal function is 1. But on the same note, sin(z) = 2 is also very much true.

Don't we smell an essence of ambiguity here, my friend? Yes, infact we do sense it. So what about 1 == 1 ? LHS is very much visibly equal to the RHS and a kid can prove that. But what if one says 1 != 1 ? Does that sound insane? Well, infact no, it doesn't.To understand it we have to realise as what does that '1' represent? Does it represent a ball...a cat...a pen..or a car? Can we say 1 (ball) == 1 (cat) ? No right? Therefore the presumption of 1 == 1 hold true only for a very particular case, when we conscider the cartesian plane of numbers. Thereby concluding that it's all about the definitive terms my friend and in this 'real world' we always fall in the traps of definitive terms. Yes 1 = 1, but conditions applied !

Now let us think of the imaginary term 'i'. Well just a pretext, you know i != j ('i' is not equal to 'j'). "The Jacobian Imaginary (j) is often known as predictive imaginary" as per the definition says. Just think about the term 'predictive imaginary'. What an oxymoron ! But at the very next moment we tend to write ln(i) and we proceed to find the magnitude of 'i' and phase of 'i' and a series of mathematical derivations thus follows. But at the end of the day, if we introspect what shall we find my friend? We will find that we have been dealing with an imaginary term that has no existence in the 'real' world ! Yet, we take up that imaginary term, include that in our mathematical equations, solve it and viola ! we derive some solutions to the problems of this real world ! 

Let us leave all these petty things behind and think about Betelguese. The star that is turning into a supernova. Well at least that's what the scientists say it seems to be turning to, but nobody knows as what's the future. Infact we can't figure out the future until the 'future' itself turns out to be the 'present'! But let's suppose it does turn out to be a supernova and again we will say confidently..."..Energy in this universe is conserved. It just changes its form.." ! But why must it have to be always conserved? 

A * --> super(nova(nova(nova(nova(nova()))))) Not needed right? Well I understand it is hard to make out any sense from this but just to be indefinite for the sake of indefiniteness, not always LHS has to be what is at the other end. They can hold hands and walk down the same path, but not necessarily they individually have to be the same. It's just that destiny can be the same. It's a long journey full of promises to keep "And miles to go before I sleep... And miles to go before I sleep...". So time will also take its toll and we all are vulnerable to changes. 

Back then I was a kid and was quite immature to understand the true essence of time. Had thought that things around me will stay just the same, in a homeostasis and thus tried to hold onto things and not let them go away. I was quite wrong enough to think that definite and projected plans work out untill there was a stretch in the space-time matrix and the journey aka life took a step forward and the things around me changed. I realised the beauty of change, the hidden marvel that lies in dynamicity of time and truly "the inevitability of change might be a universal constant" , i.e. the only thing that actually stays the same is that things are always changing. Had I realised it earlier I might have felt more safer in my harbour, but well, maybe it's just an excuse, the reality is what it is in the present and not in the past nor in the future.

You know that's the trap of the definitive world and remembering Prof. Heizenberg in this reference. The very concepts of exact position and exact velocity together, in fact, doesn't have any true meaning in Nature --the principle of Uncertainty. Isn't that similar for neural networks too which are the stepping stones of the intelligence we want to implement artificially aka artificial intelligence. Think about those models, think about those mathematical equations, the statistics and etc and etc. We go through all those nerve wrenching steps just to create a model aka a processor where we will feed some indefinite unstructured information aka data and it will take all of it and make some sense out of it, just like our brain does. See it's again the original beauty of the indefiniteness that we want to enjoy at the end of the day. The input is not equal to the output, the LHS isn't exactly equal to the RHS, but yes they are similar as the destiny is the same from the perspective of 'data'. They did have a meaning and now too they have the same meaning, it's just time has taken its toll and today they look somewhat indifferent. I wonder at times as what governs the world around us? Is it just the laws of Newtonian physics..the laws of meta-physics...the laws of mesoscopic physics...or the laws of astrophysics or something else? What is that governing equation that will define the futuristic 'today'? Is that the equations of relativity...Schrodinger's equation...equation of time...or those complex mathematical equations of Superstring theory? In which we should believe in? Isn't that confusing enough just to plan our day after getting up from bed in the morning where we deal with two equally strong forces---the 'law of attraction of the bed' and the 'law of work loads and responsibilities in the mind', leave apart these mathematically complex equations of physics. But at the end of the day I guess we all follow that single rule..the unique law...the only destiny... the Laws of Nature.

Appologies dear friend if I have created quite a lot of indefiniteness in a singularity. I don't know whether it makes any sense but it seems that every unstructured thought can give rise to something or the other just like we join the dots and create a constellation out of those indefinite stars far far away from us in the night sky. Now whether it shall turn out to be a cancer, or a sagittarius or a scorpius or an aquarius solely lies in the eyes of you, the beholder, my friend.